The “Real” Solway Firth Spaceman

Jim Templeton taken around 19641960′s, England – A local Cumbrian man takes one of the most extraordinary UFO photo’s ever seen.

It was May 23, 1964 and a local Cumbrian (UK) firefighter called Jim Templeton took his wife and daughter to Burgh Marsh an area of natural beauty approximately eight miles west of Carlisle, Northern England. Before Jim Templeton set foot there, Burgh Marsh’s claim to fame was as the site where King Edward I died of dysentry in 1307 on his way back from Scotland. Jim who was an amateur photographer wanted to take some photos of their daughter Elizabeth with his Kodak SLR – (KODAcolour X at 100th of a second at f16). She posed for him sitting on the grass for one of what was to become one of the most remarkable photographic mysteries ever.

As best as I have been able to pin down from interviews with Jim, this is very near to the location of the photo on the Marsh. Strangely enough, the location of the photo is marked out by a huge concrete arrow, which the bomber crews used in practice runs, during WWII :

burgh marsh concrete arrow

Google Streetview :


View Larger Map

A few days later, whilst popping into the local chemist to pickup the newly developed snaps the chemist remarked to Jim that the photo’s had come out well. Here is one of the three :

One of three cumberland spaceman photo's

But, the chemist remarked, it was a pity about one of the photo’s spoiled by the man in the background wearing a ‘spacesuit’pictures. Jim looked at the picture in question and this is what he saw:

Thee famous Cumberland Spaceman Pic

The figure appeared to be standing right behind Elizabeth, how had Jim not noticed this bizarre tall figure encroaching his shot? Jim and his family swore that they never saw another person on the marsh, and this mysterious figure wasn’t in any of the other photographs Jim had taken. He had taken three pictures in quick succession of Elizabeth, and only the middle photo of the three, had this figure on it.

The story could have ended there but word soon got round and the photo made the local and then national papers. The photo was also passed to the Carlisle police and then sent on to Penrith where photographic experts studied it and finally, Kodak who checked the camera for faults and the original negative for signs of tampering.

The photograph made it down under and was published in Australian newspapers, soon after. The newspaper contacted Jim and requested a copy of the negative of the picture.

Shortly after, Jim reported that a Technician from the Blue Streak Missile project in Woomera, contacted Jim directly and told him he had spotted a similar looking unauthorised figure on the launchpad during an aborted countdown.

bluestreak missile woomera australiaWoomera, Australia was the launch site of a big space project called Blue Streak. On May 23, 1964 a rocket launch countdown was apparently aborted when security cameras caught two “men” in white spacesuits walking around the launch pad. When the site was checked later by security staff no person or tracks could be found, the operator who had reported the incident was sent on leave. This freaky incident happened within hours of Jim snapping his photograph on the otherside of the world.

Later, Jim learned that rockets used for the Blue Streak project were being manufactured at RAF Spadeadam, England which is 25 miles from Burgh Marsh.

The picture and negative was exhaustively examined by Kodak’s experts for any signs of tampering or hoax but none could be found. They then offered a reward of free film for a year to any person that could solve the mystery as to how this figure got into the picture. To this day the reward lies unclaimed.

This is where the legend of the Cumberland Spaceman was born.

Recent recreation of the Cumberland Spaceman PhotoStranger still, Jim was visited by two strangers wearing dark suits who claimed to be Government officials, who drove a dark Jaguar. They pulled Jim out of his day job to take them and show them the site where the photo was taken. They asked Jim specific questions about the weather, had he seen any local people or animal activity on the day. They then tried to get Jim to admit that it was all just a big hoax, to which Jim refused to admit. It was at that point they drove off and left him and it was a five mile hike back to the firestation where Jim worked.

Australian reporters wanted to view the blue streak film taken on May 23rd, but were told it was missing from the archive where it was stored.

About a year later, Jim and Elizabeth returned to the marsh and took more photo’s. They sent them off as normal but the negatives were returned unprocessed with a note which stated that the pictures would not be processed. For a while, Jim said he had to send photos to be processed under the name of his neighbours.

The only known fact in this case, is the photo has never been conclusively proved to be fake and Jim has never attempted to make any serious money from it.

Its a great tale.


Investigations Into The Solway Spaceman Photo- My Own Investigation
Spaceman/Woomera/Blue Streak incident – The Spaceman On The Launch Pad In Australia
The Men In Black Visit Jim Templeton – A look at the MIB incident
Jim Templeton – Bio/Obituary

Have a look at my own investigation into the Spaceman photo here.

Check out this excellent video of the incident from Disclose.tv taken from a UK UFO program presented by Jenny Randles. Featuring an interview with Jim Templeton.


Disclose.tvthe cumberland spaceman 1964 Video

Also of interest taken from the News and Star website 13 August 2011

An MoD official recently responded to the paper in regard to MOD Files on the incident, that the Templeton photo was of no interest to the MoD and added: “With regard to a photograph taken of a space-suited figure by Mr James Templeton of Carlisle in 1964, if such information has survived, it will now be open for viewing at The National Archives.”

MOD files were routinely destroyed after five years until 1967 when they were generally preserved for the National Archives. A few have survived before 1967 and these together with records up to 1977 are now available for public viewing.

The National Archives can be contacted at Ruskin Avenue, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 4DU or telephone, 020 8876 3444.

The National Archives also have a website giving information about the records they hold and how to access them at www.nationalarchives.gov.uk. > The Ministry of Defence

Freedom of Information website also contains some released information on UFOs. This can be accessed via the internet at: http://www.mod.uk/defenceinternet/freedomofinformation/publicationscheme

Share
  • Anonymous

    Hmm, quite the mystery.  Who is the elusive Spaceman?  Personally I always had my doubts about The Stig  :)   That video clip is pretty interesting too, though the only real proof it brought to light is to the theory that you can never expect to get a word in edgeways once you’ve got ol’ man Jim reminiscing!

  • Rafael

    (Brasil:) Alguém parou para pensar que a imagem do homem na foto pode ter sido inserida no estúdio fotográfico por algum funcionário no momento da revelação?

    • http://www.cumberlandspaceman.co.uk The Spaceman

      Não, esta foi verificada indepentandly pela KODAK peritos em 1960 muito antes computadores. Lembranças. Spaceman

  • jagmaster

    According to the book Out of the Shadows by Dr David Clarke the photo is a fake. The photo was analysed by a Roger Green of Bradford University who concluded that “the photo was a composite made using some superimposition technique”.

    However Dr Clarke does not believe that Jim Templeton faked it himself. Jim Templeton had a reputation as a bit of a practial joker and was well known by the staff where he got the photos developed. Dr Clarke believes that they faked the photos as a way of getting thier own back, and were going to tell Mr Templeton later. However the whole thing quickly got out of hand, and after all the attention the photo attracted they felt they had no option but to keep quiet.

    As for the M.I.B, Nick Pope believes they were civilians impersonating MoD officials for their own ends.

        

    • http://www.cumberlandspaceman.co.uk The Spaceman

      Hmmm that’s really interesting Jagmaster, I will definitely check that out. Regards.

  • Klaus
  • stewyg

    I watched the film. Interesting but there are glaring inconsistencies between what is said by him and the written evidence. The female researcher mentioned about the ‘hovering objects spotted at the blue streak launch’, yet mr templeton stated that he was told ’2 large men in the firing area dressed space suits’, similar to his spaceman, were spotted in woomera ( not objects as stated in the film by the interviewer)and they had to stop the launch. The report in Australia in fact makes no mention of spacemen, but does appear to refer to an extraordinary object hovering nearby, not 2 men in spacesuits. Also,the photo was taken on a coastal marsh, which is at least 20 miles away from where the blue streak was getting assembled, and not in the direction in which the photo was taken.The reporter says the film missing was dated the same week as mr templeton’s photo was taken,not the same day.

    • http://www.cumberlandspaceman.co.uk The Spaceman

      I tend to take the Woomera incident with a pinch of salt aswell. Too much made of too many tenuous links. As you point out Spadeadam and Solway aren’t exactly next door and the link wasn’t established between the photo and the missile testing until much later.

  • Zidaniel99

    In my opinion (you may think this is slightly far-fetched), this figure is a time-traveller – from the future. Whoever this person is comes from an age where time travel is possible, and they have also mastered invisibility for the human form through a practical white suit. The invisibility factor would allow this person to go around the laws or the paradox because he can therefore not be seen by anyone and in turn, alter the future. However, obviously it is not invisible to the eye of a camera and that’s why he can be seen in the picture above. I would appreciate if you would spend the time to e-mail me back with your opinions, zidaniel99@hotmail.co.uk

    • http://www.cumberlandspaceman.co.uk The Spaceman

      Hi Zidaniel,

      Thanks for stopping by and commenting, I have always looked for the rational explanation with this. but have always been careful never to pour scorn on the ‘otherworldly’ theory. I mean we have nothing to measure it against but that doesn’t mean its too fantastically to be true and that’s for me where the Spaceman mystery gets its interest from. It’s never yet been proven as a fake.
      The other thing about the otherworldly theory is to discount it would be playing into the hands of human arrogance, there are things we think we understand so we attach theories to them which are never challenged. There is also much we do not yet understand about the Universe.
      If you are interested in some further reading on it, check out the solway/cumberland Spaceman threads on David Icke forum, the otherworldy aspect is the main topic.
      Any ideas you have I would love to hear.

      Dave Armitage

      —– Reply message —–

  • clogiebear

    OMG. I am not even kidding, my mum’s friend has a photo exactly like this that her dad took when she was younger. I’ll try and get in contact with her to see if she can locate it and if she knows where it was taken. It is a picture of some scenery and there is a spaceman in the shot!

    • http://www.cumberlandspaceman.co.uk The Spaceman

      I would love to see that xclogiebear if you can find it.

      —– Reply message —–

  • Brendan

    Not to steal your thunder for putting together a well-researched sight, but the only really mysterious aspect of this case is why people continue to assume Jim Templeton’s word is infallible.

    The photo itself can be explained by a normal human being standing with their back to the camera, wearing any number of clothing items (the lack of clear focus makes positive ID on their fashion sense difficult :p) and only Mr. Templeton’s claims suggest this is not the case.  There is no evidence to show that he took these photos in such quick succession that no passerby could butt in, there is no evidence that his family was the only one in the vicinity at the time, there is no evidence that any shadowy men ever picked him up and harassed him, and there is no evidence his ‘spaceman’ was ever in Woomera.  This needn’t make him a liar, for if he was completely oblivious to the presence of this other person, his statements and reaction to the photo have the ring of truth about them.

    Personally I believe that Mr Templeton was so fixated on his lovely daughter that he did not notice the white-clad person ambling about, that the odd shape and spooky ‘infiltration’ aroused his curiousity, and once the media ran with the story, that he dare not suggest it might just be a fella in a white top, for fear of ridicule and the loss of public interest, and let’s face it, it’s nice to be interesting.

    • http://www.cumberlandspaceman.co.uk The Spaceman

      No you haven’t stolen my thunder. For my own part I present this purely as a record of the incident based on as much info as I could lay my hands on. In my other Spaceman related articles I have reached a conclusion based purely on the evidence at hand that it most likely of Earth origin. However, I keep an open mind either way as I wasn’t there I can never say.

      To paraphrase Martin Sheen from the 1994 Roswell movie (regarding Alien contact) “One must proceed cautiously, on guard against ones desire to want it to be true and want it not to be true. One must be as much as possible – neutral!”.

      I kind of think that says it all.

      As for Jim whatever happened on the day, he will take it to his grave!

      Regards.

  • Peterd

    The camera used was not a Kodak, but one of the East German Zeiss Jena Contax/Pentacon F series with large wind-knobs. (For details of this camera series see: http://www.praktica-collector.de/100_Contax_F.htm) The Pentacon F was the decendant of the Contax S, an early series-production SLR, first released in 1950. I use a 1951 Contax S, so I am quite familiar with this design. As the camera used in the spaceman pictures has large wind knobs it can’t have been made before 1956.

    I believe the “Kodak SLR” reference is erroneous and is a conflation of the film’s manufacturer with that of the camera. Kodak did market a range of SLR’s from 1959 onwards, but these were the West German Nagel-manufactured “Retina Reflex” series and have a very different appearance to the camera in the images on the cumberland spaceman site, with a selenium meter cell on the right front of the camera and a plain top cover with bottom lever film advance, not knobs on top. (For more detail see; http://camerapedia.wikia.com/wiki/Kodak_Retina_Reflex)

    One of the features of the Contax S/D/ Pentacon F is that it has a primitive plain-glass view screen (Steven’s Screen) for focussing, which makes the finder image quite dim and only really sharp in the centre.

    The viewfinder image is quite restricted and shows approximately 70% of the full 24×36 mm frame of the 135 film format. Any modern SLR would have a brighter viewfinder covering at least 92% of the frame.

    Therefore an object at the very edge of the frame may not be seen before taking the picture.

    Another limitation is that the Contax/Pentacon F also does not have an “instant return mirror”, so once the photographer presses the shutter release the viewfinder goes black and stays that way until the camera is re-wound for the next shot.

    The lens appears to be a Zeiss Jena 58mm Biotar with a maximum aperture of f/2.0. These were (are) superb professional quality coated lenses of a double-Gauss design and easily match a modern DSLR lens for image quality. 2/58mm Zeiss Biotar’s are highly sought-after today and can fetch hundreds of pounds in good condition for use on DSLR’s. With such a top-quality coated optic I really doubt that the “spaceman” image is a result of internal reflections or an optical flaw, particularly as the rest of the images on the roll came out properly exposed and without artifacts.

    So in summation the relevant technical issues are:

    1) the view finder image is quite dim
    2) the viewfinder only shows 70% of the frame
    3) once the shutter is fired, the viewfinder goes black
    4) lens used was of professional quality

    In conclusion, if an object or person appeared at the edge of the frame immediately before the shutter was fired or during the taking of the image, the photographer may not have known about it. 

    • http://www.cumberlandspaceman.co.uk The Spaceman

      Very interesting info about the camera technology.

      —– Reply message —–

  • http://www.cookiesfromthedarkside.wordpress.com MichaelL65

    The one thing I do find interesting about this is the fact that, since this picture has become famous around the world, no one has come forward claiming to be the person in the image behind the girl. Anyway, I love a good mystery, and maybe some things should just be left that way!